The continued legal challenges to the constitutionality of certain aspects of the National Labor Relations Board and the National Labor Relations ...

In a Feb. 20 letter, the acting solicitor general wrote that the “multiple layers of removal protections” for administrative ...

Last summer, the high court held in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy that the SEC must seek civil fines in court rather than through in-house proceedings. “How do you ...

Trump’s DOJ said the president can fire administrative law judges at will, challenging legal protections amid broader efforts to expand executive power.

In SEC v. Jarkesy, the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the SEC when the court’s majority held that such proceedings violate a respondent’s Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial when the ...

A new executive order from Trump expands presidential oversight of independent regulatory agencies like the FCC and FTC ...

Stark law enforcement is evolving rapidly, with heightened scrutiny, a record-breaking volume of qui tam lawsuits, and new legal precedents reshaping compliance risks for physicians and ASCs.

A review of recent changes and horizon issues in US International Trade Commission (ITC or Commission) unfair import ...

In what could only cement 2024’s SEC vs. Jarkesy and Loper Bright Enterprises vs. Raimondo case rulings, which ended “Chevron deference” for federal agencies by making the court the ...

Some news organizations are calling it a "power grab" by the White House. Talk of court challenges has already emerged.

In another example highlighting the focus on administrative law last term, SEC v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s practice of seeking civil ...