News

On 23 July 2025, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) gave an advisory opinion on the obligation of states to protect the ...
Judges with the U.N.’s top court say in a landmark climate decision that a “clean, healthy and sustainable environment” is a ...
Among the key points in the ICJ ruling is that countries have binding legal obligations under the United Nations (UN) climate ...
The Environmental Protection Agency is just days away from proposing the US reverse the scientific determination that ...
The ICJ issued an opinion on climate change that stated the obligations of the Paris Agreement come with legal liability. A ...
Opinion
The Manila Times on MSN16hOpinion
World court climate ruling: Nonbinding but game-changing
The world’s top court may not be able to compel polluting states to halt planet-warming emissions, but experts say its momentous climate decision gives potent legal and political firepower to ...
The world’s top court has made it easier for governments to be held legally accountable for failing to tackle the climate ...
The first is that addressing climate change needs to be viewed through a strategic lens rather than as an altruistic act or ...
In Lightiser v. Trump, 22 young people are using the protections of the Constitution to demand a livable future.
The former state employee alleged he was pressured to lie about gas prices after the launch of Washington's carbon market.